This article is about California. People are buying foreclosed homes. The alternative is that they stand empty or be squatted. How is this greed? And where did Bachmann fit in the discussion?
The description of their conference made me sick. Yes someone has to deal with this mess but the people who helped get us there haven't seemed to learn anything.
ummm...Former Duluthian, the dicussion involved forclosed homes. baby farmer bachmann has a very high rate of forclosed homes in her distict and...oh fuck it. you obviously don't get the connection or bother to click on informative links. lalalalalala. never mind.
I think the intent of the NYT article was to lead the reader to dislike the attendees. Easy target. But they are only the small-time speculators picking over the wreckage, from other speculative ventures gone bad. Sure, some have dreadful personalities, but their function at least appears, err, useful (not talking about Bachmann).
There is plenty blame to go around, but this seems like a diversion from years of flawed central planning and public/private official corruption. Which is nearer the root, but probably a lot less interesting as a social topic.
9 Comments
c-freak
about 16 years agoedgeways
about 16 years agorediguana
about 16 years agomat
about 16 years agoSt.G
about 16 years agoFormer Duluthian
about 16 years agoStarfire
about 16 years agoc-freak
about 16 years agopH
about 16 years ago